Home / Financial Tools / Lee-Carter Stochastic Mortality Projection Engine

Graduate-Level Modeling · Actuarial Science & Longevity Risk

Lee-Carter Stochastic Mortality Projection Engine

Every pension plan, annuity book and life insurer carries one enormous unhedged assumption: how fast mortality will keep improving. Lee-Carter (1992) turned that assumption into a statistical model with genuine forecast uncertainty, and it remains the benchmark every newer mortality model is measured against.

How To Use This Model

Reading This Tool

This tool simulates fifty years of mortality experience for ages 40 to 90 with improvement dynamics you control, then fits the Lee-Carter model exactly as the original paper did: take log death rates, centre by age, and extract the dominant time signal by singular value decomposition.

The fitted mortality index kt is then projected forward as a random walk with drift, the drift and its standard error estimated from the fitted series itself, and the whole projection is translated into the number that actually matters to a pension plan: life expectancy at 65, with uncertainty bands.

Mortality Experience & Projection

The simulated surface uses a Gompertz-style age profile calibrated to modern Canadian-scale mortality levels, with your improvement rate driving the hidden kt process. The fit sees only the noisy rates, never the true parameters, exactly the estimation problem an actuary faces with real data.

Fitted Model & Longevity Projection

Fit: –

Estimated Drift Of kt

-

Variance Explained By 1st SVD Factor

-

Life Expectancy At 65, Today

-

Projected e₆₅ At Horizon

-

Mortality Index kt: Fitted History & Random-Walk-With-Drift Forecast Fan

-

-

Where The Improvement Lands

bx At Age 45

-

bx At Age 65

-

bx At Age 85

-

Current m₆₅ (Fitted)

-

Age Sensitivity bx: Which Ages Respond To The Mortality Index

Baseline Log Mortality ax By Age

Why One Index Can Carry A Whole Surface

-

The Longevity Risk Reading

-

From Model To Balance Sheet

Each additional year of life expectancy at 65 raises the cost of a typical indexed pension annuity by roughly 3-4%. That is why the uncertainty band on this page is not academic decoration: the difference between the upper and lower e₆₅ paths at the horizon is a direct, first-order range on the liability side of any defined-benefit plan or annuity book, and it is exactly the risk that longevity swaps and buy-ins exist to transfer.

Actuarial Science & Longevity Risk

The Model & Estimation

ln mx,t = ax + bxkt + εx,t
x = (1/T)Σt ln mx,t,   (bx, kt) from the leading singular vectors of the centred surface
Identification:  Σxbx = 1,  Σtkt = 0
kt+1 = kt + δ + et,  et ~ N(0, σ²k),   forecast se(kT+h) ≈ σk√h

Estimation follows Lee and Carter (1992) exactly: centre log rates by age, then extract the rank-one structure by singular value decomposition (computed here by power iteration, verified to recover known parameters to machine precision on noiseless surfaces). The mortality index is forecast as a random walk with drift, the specification the original authors found adequate for U.S. data and which remains the default in practice. Life expectancy is computed from projected rates under a constant force of mortality within each age, qx = 1−e−mx, with the standard half-year adjustment.

When To Actually Use This Model

  • Producing mortality improvement assumptions with an uncertainty band, rather than a single deterministic improvement scale, for pension valuations and annuity pricing sensitivity work.
  • Quantifying longevity risk exposure: the fan on this page is the raw material of longevity value-at-risk and the pricing of longevity swaps and buy-ins.
  • Teaching the decomposition at the heart of every modern stochastic mortality model, Renshaw-Haberman cohort extensions and the Cairns-Blake-Dowd family are all reactions to this baseline.

Key Assumptions & Limitations

  • A single time factor: every age improves in lockstep proportion bx, so the model cannot capture cohort effects (generations with persistently distinct mortality), the Renshaw-Haberman extension adds these.
  • The random-walk-with-drift forecast extrapolates the historical trend indefinitely; structural changes, pandemics, medical breakthroughs, break it, as 2020-2021 experience demonstrated in every national dataset.
  • This page fits simulated experience for exposition. Real Canadian work uses CIA improvement scales (MI-2017 and successors) and Human Mortality Database inputs, with the same machinery underneath.

Foundational References

Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R. (1992). Modeling and Forecasting U.S. Mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(419), 659-671.

Brouhns, N., Denuit, M., & Vermunt, J. K. (2002). A Poisson Log-Bilinear Regression Approach to the Construction of Projected Lifetables. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31(3), 373-393.

Cairns, A. J. G., Blake, D., & Dowd, K. (2006). A Two-Factor Model for Stochastic Mortality with Parameter Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(4), 687-718.

Pricing the liabilities these projections feed?